![]() This is helpful because you sometimes have the same font supplied from multiple companies and what the user is looking for is "Century Book" and is frustrated when he/she can't find it because it's got a company name prefaced to it that pushes it into an unexpected location in the font list. For example, "ITC Century Book" would be listed with the C's because the company initials "ITC" would be ignored. This list is ordered alphabetically with one caveat: company or font foundary names are usually ignored. In my original Helvetica example, you would select "Helvetica" from the first list. The second list contains the available combinations of width, weight and slope for the selected font family in the first list. The first list contains the font family name. One way to display the parameters and facilitate user selection is to provide the user with two lists. Bold (really is Bold-the only accurate one)įixing this will require that Writer obtain the full parameters for each font and correctly display the parameters in its user interface so the user can select the font they truly want without guesswork or trial and error.What a muddled mess! How would someone unfamiliar with this font family know how to choose "bold" in order to select the black weight?Īgain, what Writer fails to do is look inside the font to see that all of these fonts are members of the same family (VAG Rounded) and have four different weights (thin, light, bold, black) with no sloped members (no italics). But to select the black weight you must select the light weight and, again, turn on the program's "bold" attribute. To select the bold weight under Writer, you have to select the thin weight and turn on the program's "bold" attribute. There are four weights commonly provided: thin, light, bold and black. Nor does it gather the correct weight, width and slope parameters from each font so they can be properly organized in Writer's font list.Ĭonsider another example: the VAG Rounded typeface. Why? Because Writer does not appear to read or use the font family name to see that all of these fonts are members of the same Helvetica family. Yet this is frankensteined under Writer into fractured Helvetica, Helvetica Black, Helvetica Black Cond, Helvetica Cond, Helvetica Light and Helvetica Light Cond pseudo families. This should give us 16 choices under the "Helvetica" family: We use four weights (light, medium, bold, black) and two widths (normal, condensed), all with both plain and italic (oblique) slopes. ![]() This is a famously common typeface that was designed by Linotype and which Microsoft ape'd with its Arial version. ![]() We expect more from word processing software today.įor example, a staple sans serif font in our work is Helvetica. As such, Writer cannot support a full range of fonts within a family but is stuck in the stone age of only two weights and two slopes: regular, regular italic, bold and bold italic. The problems are pretty basic: Writer does not recognize the family name and key parameters of a font. (We're running Windows 7 Ultra 64-bit on our computers.) We're running into problems because of the antiquated font support in LibreOffice Writer 4.1.3.2 for MS Windows. If all you accept are bug reports, then the command in the Writer's Help menu should have been worded: "Report a Bug.".Įnough of that! Here's the purpose we are trying to communicate with you: We should have arrived at a "Feedback" page on your website-not a "Bug" reporting page. Why does it take us to a "Bug" report form? It doesn't make sense. We arrived at this bug report webpage by clicking on the "Send Feedback." command in the Help menu of Writer. We're trying to draw your attention to a deficiency in Writer that hurts the program and prevents us from recommending it to our clients. This bug reporting system is NOT making that easy. We're trying to provide helpful feedback about LibreOffice Writer 4.1.3.2 under MS Windows.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |